Saturday, December 8, 2007
The Hole in Thursday Nights
Get Your Tickets Now
Friday, December 7, 2007
Stockhausen Has Died

I am tremendously saddened to learn of the death of one of the 20th century's greatest composers, Karlheinz Stockhausen.
Stockhausen had an alchemist's ability to transform the base metals of total serialism into music of purest gold; in his hands the pedagogical rigors of the twelve-tone system melted into playfulness and joy.
He was the first living composer whose music bowled me over, for its sheer daring, its mixture of the monumental and the intimate, its sheer aural splendor. It is easy to make fun of his earnestness, his oddball mysticism, his late-in-life musical megalomania. But one should never forget that this was a man traumatized as a child by the Nazis, who euthanized his mentally ill mother. The fact that he could write music of such world-embracing scope is something of a miracle.
About ten years ago or so I was listening to a recording of his marvelous dual-piano work Mantra, about as good an example of his aesthetic as any, and following along with a score I borrowed from the New York Public Library. I noticed some mistakes in the score--not as hard as it seems to detect, given the way the piece is plotted. So I wrote to Stockhausen to let him know. And to my surprise and delight received a response handwritten by him, thanking me for the letter, acknowledging the mistake (the score is full of mistakes, he wrote), suggesting other recordings of the work, and finishing with his famous signature -- Stockhausen.
May his music live long.
Tuesday, December 4, 2007
Does It Come in a Violin Model?
Monday, December 3, 2007
A. S. Byatt, the Novel, and the Brain
Byatt looks toward current neurological research as an antidote to our obsessions, at least where the novel is concerned:
"A novel is made of language, and arouses both feelings and thoughts in its readers, as it should depict both feelings and thoughts in its people and its microcosm. [French neuroscientist Jean-Pierre] Changeux’s descriptions of the cells of the brain and the way they combine and recombine give me a sense of understanding the excitement, the drive, the pleasure, I get out of making worlds with words. We have had a lot of the body as desire, and listened to many professors of desire. There is something else – the human capacity to think, and to make feelings into thoughts. It is a way out of narcissism."
This linking of our new understanding of how our brains work with how we experience art is very much at the core of Jonah Lehrer's rich and beautifully written new book, Proust Was A Neuroscientist, which I reviewed for the Los Angeles Times back in October. Lehrer sees in the work of several artists--among them Proust, Gertrude Stein, Whitman, Stravinsky--anticipations of the model of the brain that is emerging from laboratories and research centers.
Lehrer and Byatt are both on to something: how writers and other artists can be the medium of an understanding of ourselves that science winds up catching up with; and how science can help bring about a new understanding of ourselves, one that can liberate us from treacherous or demoralizing worldviews, and that can open up new possibilities for artists. I am sure we'll be reading more essays and books like Byatt's and Lehrer's.